Vaccines Did Not Save Us – 2 Centuries Of Official Statistics
This is the data the drug industry do not want you to see. Here 2 centuries of UK, USA and Australian official death statistics show conclusively and scientifically modern
medicine is not responsible for and played little part in substantially
improved life expectancy and survival from disease in western
economies.
A detailed Contents listing of this article with each category of disease and related graphs appears after the Introduction.
Introduction
The main advances in
combating disease over 200 years have been better food and clean
drinking water. Improved sanitation, less overcrowded and better living
conditions also contribute. This is also borne out in published peer reviewed research:
- “The questionable contribution of medical measures to the decline of mortality in the United States in the twentieth century“. McKinlay JB, McKinlay SM, Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1977 Summer; 55(3): 405-28.
- “Symposium: Accomplishments in Child Nutrition during the 20th Century. Infant Mortality in the 20th Century, Dramatic but Uneven Progress” Myron E. Wegman School of Public Health, University of Michigan: J. Nutr. 131: 401S–408S, 2001.
In addition to the extensive static graphs below, the following superb BBC FOUR broadcast by Professor Hans Rosling shows how health improved in step with wealth over the last 200 years “200 countries over 200 years using 120,000 numbers – in just four minutes“:
Measles mortality graphs are enlightening [more below] and contradict the claims of Government health officials that vaccines have saved millions of lives. It is an unscientific claim which the data show is untrue. Here you will also learn why vaccinations like mumps and rubella for children are medically unethical and can expose medical professionals to liability for criminal proceedings and civil damages for administering them.
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
The success of the City of
Leicester, England was remarkable in reducing smallpox mortality
substantially compared to the rest of England and other countries by
abandoning vaccination between 1882 and 1908 [see more below].
This contrasts how the drug industry has turned each child in the world into a human pin-cushion profit centre.
You might think the following graph is some support for the success of diphtheria vaccination [see blue line]:-
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
England & Wales Diphtheria Mortality 1901 to 1999
Notice how overall infant mortality
was unaffected [green and purple lines]. And two official sources of
data have been used to ensure there is no doubt. Records show most
children went unvaccinated until well after the major
fall. At least half the children under 10 years of age had not been
vaccinated prior to 1946. The fall could not be attributable to vaccine
“herd immunity” [for diphtheria this is claimed to require 80-85%
vaccine coverage: Herd immunity-concepts of control UK Health Protection Agency].
To account for the fall in diphtheria mortality [blue graph line] one must look elsewhere for the cause.
The vaccination campaign was launched at the end of 1940 but got underway in 1941. By the end of 1941 “36 percent of school age children had been immunised but only about 19 percent of the younger children“: British Journal of Nursing October 1948 p121. It was only after the large fall,
that in 1946-47 there was a “catch-up” diphtheria vaccination campaign.
969,000 children under 5 years of age were vaccinated and 272,000
children aged 5-15. The total of 1,241,000 was nearly one third greater than the total number of children born in the 7 years 1938-1945, [which was 956,724 births]: Recent trends in the incidence of multiple births and associated mortality Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1987, 62, 941-950.
So what could account for this
seemingly dramatic fall? The introduction of free school milk [eg.
vitamin A etc], subsidised meals and free medical inspections for all
children in state education need to be considered as the most likely and
most serious contenders in the light of our knowledge about the effect
of improved nutrition on health.
So what this also of course means is
that health officials promote vaccination against diphtheria when the
vaccination appears most unlikely as a cause of the decline in
diphtheria. This also means that medical knowledge about basic diseases
is seriously flawed and has not advanced in this respect since at least
1940. This is an issue of who knows best? This information suggests
doctors and health officials do not seem to know at all.
If you are angry and feel you have been lied to, you are justified. But there is worse.
Do vaccines cause autistic conditions? If you read nothing else we strongly recommend you read this: PDF Download – Text of May 5th 2008 email from US HRSA to Sharyl Attkisson of CBS News]. In
it the US Health Resources Services Administration [HRSA] state to CBS
News reporter Sharyl Attkisson in response to her question about how
many cases had been compensated by the US government in which a
vaccine-injured child developed autistic symptoms:
We have compensated cases in which children exhibited an encephalopathy, or general brain disease. Encephalopathy may be accompanied by a medical progression of an array of symptoms including autistic behavior, autism, or seizures.”
Despite
all the lies and deceit by health official worldwide, the question “do
vaccines cause autism” was answered after the Hannah Poling story broke
in the USA in February 2008 [see CHS article here].
Hannah developed an autistic condition after 9 vaccines administered
the same day. Under the media spotlight numerous US health officials
and agencies conceded on broadcast US nationwide TV news from CBS and
CNN. Full details with links to the original sources can be found in
this CHS article: Vaccination Causes Autism – Say US Government & Merck’s Director of Vaccines. [Blue Text added 10 April 2011]
The financial markets have known for 20 years and more the
pharmaceutical industry’s blockbuster patented drugs business model
would eventualy fail. We now see the Bill Gates’ type business model
emerging – almost everyone has Windows software on their PC – almost
everyone will be vax’ed. Gates quickly became a multi-billionaire.
With vastly more people to vaccinate than computers requiring software
the lure of money is many times greater. All this whilst we watch as
childhood prevalence of asthma, allergies, autism, diabetes and more
have increased exponentially as the vaccines have been introduced.
Can “vaccinatable” diseases “return”
despite vaccination? Yes. If you are too poorly nourished your body
is likely to lack essential nutrients needed to maintain its immune
system sufficiently to withstand disease. This will happen regardless
of how many vaccinations you have had. This was experienced in Eastern
Europe following the collapse of the old Soviet Bloc and the economic
chaos which ensued, leaving many in great poverty.
For the same reason vaccines do not
“work” and “save” lives in impoverished African and other third world
economies. The majority of third world child deaths still occur despite
vaccination. These children need proper food, clean water to drink and
wash in and sanitation. We give them vaccines instead.
These third world children die because we have vaccines. In the 21st Century, despite all the claims made about modern science, we have no effective treatments for common basic childhood diseases.
It has been estimated vaccines
prevent 25% of the deaths of these children, so 75% still die. If there
were effective treatments we could save their lives.
We have no effective treatments
because there is no incentive for the drug industry and every incentive
for them not to develop them. The World Health Organisation and our
health departments worldwide, in thrall to and under the influence of
the drug industry, do nothing about it.
Something could be done. This needs
political commitment from western developed nations and the courage to
stand up against vested commercial interests to develop effective
treatments to save lives – children’s lives.
And when you read the vaccine
movement blogs claiming those concerned with vaccine safety are acting
out irrational unfounded unscientific fears, remember the highly
specific factual referenced reasoned justified information provided on
just this one site, among many others. Also ask yourself, how often do
government agencies and officials lie publicly about pretty much
anything. And notice how bloggers attack, disparage, bully abuse and
harass those who express concerns about vaccines, leaving government
officials and drug industry spokespeople able to hide silently behind
the barrages of abuse and misinformation. Some of these anonymous
individuals are commenting full time daily across numerous blogs and
news sites across the internet but deny they are paid. Some appear to
be awake 24 hours a day. Odd that. One we counted had made 200
comments in 10 days to April 22 2014. That was on just a selection of
sample sites and did not include all that anonymous commenter’s
activity.
[ED Note 15 Oct 2009: As information like that here has become available health
officials are changing from scaremongering parents into vaccinating
with claims their child could die. Now they claim vaccinating reduces
the numbers of cases of disease [ie. instead of deaths] and produce graphs of dramatic falls in reported cases (instead of deaths) when measles vaccine was introduced.
This is again misleading. A dramatic fall in the numbers of reported measles cases would be expected. Doctors substantially overdiagnose measles cases especially when they believe it is a possible diagnosis.Doctors were told the vaccine prevented children getting measles when introduced in the late 1960’s so after that time a substantial reduction in diagnoses would be expected.
Examples of recent overdiagnoses of measles when there are measles “scares” are proportionately up to 74 times (or 7400% overdiagnosed). Figures and sources follow the next paragraph.
What health
officials are also doing is relying on very old and unreliable data
which ignores that measles has become progressively milder so the risks
of long term injury have diminished – (and death is the most extreme
form of long term injury – shown here by official data to have
diminished rapidly and substantially over the past 100 years without the
risks posed to children’s health by vaccines).
Measles Over Diagnosed – Up to 7400%
A. Laboratory confirmed cases of measles, mumps, and rubella, England and Wales: October to December 2004
Notified: 474, Tested: 589†, Confirmed cases: 8
RATE OF OVERDIAGNOSIS:- 589/8 = proportionately 7400% or 74 times overdiagnosed
SOURCE: CDR Weekly, Volume 15 Number 12 Published: 24 March 2005
[Note from Source:
ҠSome oral fluid specimens were submitted early from suspected cases
and may not have been subsequently notified, thus the proportion tested
is artificially high for this quarter.”]
B. Total confirmed cases of measles and oral fluid IgM antibody tests in cases notified to ONS*: weeks 40-52/2005
Notified: 408, Tested: 343, Confirmed cases: 22
RATE OF OVERDIAGNOSIS:- 343/22 = proportionately 1560 % or 15.6 times overdiagnosed
SOURCE: CDR Weekly, Volume 16 Number 12 Published on: 23 March 2006
Contents
Leicester & Smallpox
Scurvy Mortality Rates
To start you with something simple,
Scurvy, Typhoid and Scarlet Fever are good examples to use as
comparisons with “vaccinatable” diseases.
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
Medicine and especially drugs and vaccines played no part in the fall in Scurvy death rates and the same can be seen for other diseases. Scurvy is a condition caused by a lack of vitamin C.
Poor nutrition, particularly a lack of fresh fruit and vegetables, can
result in Scurvy. Mortality rates fell dramatically as living
conditions improved.
Typhoid & Scarlet Fever – Mortality UK, USA & Australia
Typhoid and Scarlet Fever vanished without vaccines but with clean water, better nutrition, sanitation and living conditions.
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
Australia Typhoid Mortality Rates 1880 to 1970
[SOURCE: Data – Official Year Books of the Commonwealth of Australia, as reproduced in Greg Beattie’s book “Vaccination A Parent’s Dilemma“ – Downloadable Now]
Australia Scarlet Fever Mortality Rates 1880 to 1970
[SOURCE: Data – Official Year Books of the Commonwealth of Australia, as reproduced in Greg Beattie’s book “Vaccination A Parent’s Dilemma“ – Downloadable Now]
MEASLES MORTALITY UK & USA
By 2007 the chance of anyone in England and Wales dying of measles if no one were vaccinated was less than 1 in 55 million. The chance of being struck by lightning is 30 to 60 times higher: Tornado & Storm Research Organisation
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
Note that what seem large
fluctuations after MMR vaccination was introduced in 1988 are not so
large and are a feature of plotting the graph on a logarithmic scale.
This can be seen in the following graph, plotted on an analog scale.
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
The graph below is from a peer refereed medical paper: Englehandt
SF, Halsey NA, Eddins DL, Hinman AR. Measles mortality in the United
States 1971-1975. Am J Public Health 1980;70:1166–1169. The red
dotted trendline has been added. This shows US measles mortality was
falling regardless of whether vaccination was used. By 2010 overall
measles mortality in the USA was to fall to around 1 in 25 million
without vaccines. As the severity of measles declined, long
term complications would also. Whilst people still caught measles it was
not the dreaded disease we are told it is today.
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
The seeming fall in reported
ordinary [ie. non fatal] measles cases in the above Halsey graph after
1968 is misleading. Doctors are poor in accuracy of diagnosis and follow
fashions. Official UK records for 2006 show that when doctors are
looking for a disease, they overdiagnose suspected measles cases varying
by 10 times to 74 times higher than is confirmed by laboratory testing:
[74 times overdiagnosed SOURCE: CDR Weekly, Volume 15 Number 12 Published: 24 March 2005], [10 times overdiagnosed, CDR Weekly, PHLS 12:26], [ 15.6 times overdiagnosed, SOURCE: CDR Weekly, Volume 16 Number 12 Published on: 23 March 2006]
Correspondingly, when vaccination
was introduced, they will tend to follow the fashion of not diagnosing
measles, where they believe it controlled by vaccination. This following
of fashions has been seen in other areas, including Coroner diagnoses
of causes of death.
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
[SOURCE: Data – Official Year Books of the Commonwealth of Australia, as reproduced in Greg Beattie’s book “Vaccination A Parent’s Dilemma“ – Downloadable Now]
Mumps Mortality – England & Wales
It is not exaggeration but accurate
to state that mumps vaccination takes the medical profession firmly into
the territory of the criminal law and unethical medical treatment of
children.
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
Providing treatment to a patient
that is not clinically needed and misleading patients as to the clinical
need for a treatment so as to vitiate their consent can mean the
administration of the treatment is a criminal offence: Appleton v
Garrett (1995) 34 BMLR 23.
According to The British Medical Association (‘BMA’) and The Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain (RPSGB) mumps vaccination is clinically inappropriate:-
“Since mumps and its complications are very rarely serious there is little indication for the routine use of mumps vaccine”: British National Formulary (‘BNF’) 1985 and 1986
Freedom of Information documents
show the UK’s Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation and
Ministry of Defence agreed as early as 1974 that:-
“there was no need to introduce routine vaccination against mumps” because “complications from the disease were rare” JCVI minutes 11 Dec 1974.
Doctors and nurses who fail to tell
parents mumps vaccine in MMR is clinically unnecessary, of the exact
risks of adverse reactions and then give the vaccine appear to be
behaving unethically, potentially in contravention of the
criminal law and liable to civil proceedings for damages. They are also
unable to explain the exact risks because data on adverse reactions are
not being collected properly or at all, and there is evidence showing
adverse reaction data are suppressed.
A consequence is that giving MMR
vaccine to children cannot be justified on clinical or ethical grounds.
And as there is insufficient clinical benefit to children to introduce
mass mumps vaccination, it cannot be justified as a general public
health measure.
And one consequence of this unnecessary measure
is that we are now putting young male adults at risk of orchitis and
sterility because they did not catch natural mumps harmlessly when
children and because MMR vaccination is not effective in conferring full
or lasting immunity across an entire population.
One effect of MMR vaccination has
been to push mumps outbreaks into older age groups. Mumps now
circulates in colleges and universities: Mumps and the UK epidemic 2005, R K Gupta, J Best, E MacMahon BMJ 2005;330:1132-1135 (14 May).
1 in 4 males who has achieved
puberty and has not achieved immunity to mumps runs the risk of
orchitis. Orchitis (usually unilateral) has been reported as a
complication in 20-30% of clinical mumps cases in postpubertal males.
Some testicular atrophy occurs in about 35% of cases of mumps orchitis: Mumps – Emedicine. This
means one of the male testicles shrivels up. Affected men can become
sterile in one testicle. This affects one in every nine males who catch
mumps after puberty compared with none who catch it before puberty. It
is only because most men have two testicles and only one is affected
that total sterility is rare. Most men would find that little
consolation. Having a shrivelled testicle would carry psychological and
practical consequences for any intimate physical relationship in adult
life. The message seems to be it is better for a child to catch mumps
naturally before puberty.
Rubella Mortality, England and Wales
As with mumps, rubella vaccination
again takes the medical profession into the territory of the criminal
law and unethical treatment of children. A
graph for rubella mortality is not included because death from rubella
over the last century was so rare the figures are insufficient to plot a
graph of any note.
Aside
from a rash the adverse effects of rubella for children are minimal.
Vaccination against rubella is of no clinical benefit to a child
particularly when compared to the risks of adverse vaccine reactions. If
a pregnant woman catches rubella infection during the first three
months of pregnancy and the child survives, this poses a risk to the
unborn child of being born with congenital rubella syndrome (CRS),
involving multiple congenital abnormalities.
Prior
to the introduction of rubella vaccine, the number of annual cases in
the UK was small, around 50 per annum. Additionally, 92% of rubella cases deliver normal healthy children: DANISH MEDICAL BULLETIN MARCH 1987 – WAVES Vol. 11 No. 4 p. 21 .This
small risk can also be reduced either by making sure all women have
caught rubella as children or by vaccinating those who have not prior to
puberty. This minimises the exposure of children to the vaccine and
hence to unnecessary risks of adverse vaccine reactions.
In comparison birth defects from any other cause are much higher:
“Birth defects affect about one in every 33 babies born in the United States each year. They are the leading cause of infant deaths, accounting for more than 20% of all infant deaths. Babies born with birth defects have a greater chance of illness and long term disability than babies without birth defects.“: Birth Defects US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention – accessed 11th May 2008
To
see how egregious is the exaggeration of risk from rubella in order to
scare parents into vaccinating their children, see the following:-
- False Government Rubella Scare Stories – Reply to Professor Louis Z Cooper 6 June 2005
- Rubella Scares – Demonstrating the Figures are False11 August 2005
- False Government Rubella Scare Stories – Only 20,000 Percent Overstated 1 June 2005
MORTALITY, LIFE EXPECTANCY, HEALTHCARE COSTS UK, USA AND WORLDWIDE
Does paying for healthcare bring you
better health and a longer life? No. The following graphs show that
in 1996, average life expectancy in the US was 18th of all countries,
being 5 years less than Canada and behind the UK. But Americans were
paying per person US$1000 or over 1/3rd more than Canadians and nearly
2/3rds more than the British. And if you then take a look at the graphs
of mortality, what were Americans getting for their money? Mortality
rates were falling anyway, regardless and kept on falling. Life
expectancy increased as time went by, but again substantially due to
overall improved living conditions.
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
MORTALITY – USA AND UK
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
DISEASE MORTALITY UK, USA & AUSTRALIA
MEASLES, SCARLET FEVER, WHOOPING COUGH, TYPHOID, DIPHTHERIA, INFLUENZA, PNEUMONIA & TUBERCULOSIS
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
The following is the same USA graph
as just above, but with Influenza and Tuberculosis Deaths included. And
you can see that Influenza deaths were not prevented by a vaccine –
because for most of the period covered, there was no vaccine available
at all and when it became available, it was not freely available until
the present day – when guess what – ‘flu mortality had already plummeted
– and guess what else – it does not work particularly well either – in
fact so badly it may well be best avoided.
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
The following is the same graph as above but showing the full curve for influenza and pneumonia mortality.
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
DIPHTHERIA MORTALITY
England, USA & Australia
Here we see Diphtheria mortality
falling all by itself. In the UK, the vaccine was introduced in 1940,
but most children particularly under 5 did not get it and there was a
large catch-up campaign in 1945-6 as previously explained [above]. The
under 5 age group are the most at risk from infectious disease.
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
[SOURCE: Data – Official Year Books of the Commonwealth of Australia, as reproduced in Greg Beattie’s book “Vaccination A Parent’s Dilemma“ – Downloadable Now]
Diphtheria vaccine was introduced to the UK in 1940. As already noted, it appears beyond doubt that diptheria vaccine was not responsible for the sudden fall in diphtheria mortality from 1941 to 1946 [see graph]. The records show at least half of all children up to the age of 15 went unvaccinated until 1946-7 ie. after the major fall.
The graph of total infant mortality provides a benchmark showing the
continuing steady decline in the rate of infant mortality before and
after the introduction of the vaccine.
By the end of 1941:-
“about 36 percent of school age children had been immunised but only about 19 percent of the younger children“: British Journal of Nursing October 1948 p121.
It was not until 1946-7 – after the
substantial fall in diphtheria mortality had taken place that a major
effort was made to vaccinate the children who had been missed. 969,000
children under 5 were “immunised”: British Journal of Nursing October 1948 p121. With an annual birth rate in the region of 200,000 that represented most of the children born during 1941 to 1946. So diphtheria vaccination could not have been responsible for the fall.
But we can identify what was most likely responsible.
We can see the impact of the social health and welfare reforms of 1944,
1947 and 1948. Free school milk provided, among other nourishment,
vitamin A to help children’s immune systems fight disease. It is
vitamin A which the World Health Organisation is keen to provide to
third world children now for the same reason.
It can be seen that the benchmark
decline in general infant mortality (ie. all causes of infant death)
closely follows the decline in diphtheria mortality in the general
population. This again demonstrates that the decline in diphtheria
mortality was part of a general trend and had little or nothing to do
with the introduction of vaccination.
WHOOPING COUGH (PERTUSSIS) MORTALITY – UK, USA & Australia
Whooping Cough or Pertussis – again,
the mortality rates fell substantially well before any vaccines were
introduced. The contribution, if any, to overall health has been
negligible. The decline in general infant mortality closely
follows the decline in Whooping Cough mortality in the general
population. This again demonstrates that the decline in Whooping Cough
mortality was part of a general trend and had little or nothing to do
with the introduction of vaccination:-
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
Tetanus Mortality – England & Wales 1901 to 1999
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
- Tetanus Mortality England & Wales 1901 to 1999
This graph demonstrates that the
administration of tetanus vaccine is likely to be pointless and puts
children especially at risk of adverse reactions to the vaccines.
There is only one respect in which
modern medicine could have had an indirect effect. This came with the
social reforms of 1947-48 which saw the introduction of the National
Health Service. Coupled with this was the start of the reduction in
numbers of farm workers with the start of increased mechanisation and
industrial scale farming in Britain after the 1939-1945 World War. The
numbers of farm labourers fell by half post war and the increase in
mechanisation also reduced the chances of the injuries which were likely
to result in tetanus
Fewer agricultural workers coupled
with better access to healthcare would result in better treatment of
wounds. Tetanus thrives in deep wounds which are not properly
cleansed. So by having fewer agricultural workers and better wound care
could reduce the incidence of tetanus cases. So if the reduction in
tetanus mortality in the 1950s is anything other than part of the
continuing decline with better standards of living, those two reasons
are the most likely explanations.
SMALLPOX MORTALITY-UK, USA & SWEDEN
In the graphs notice the large
numbers of deaths caused by the smallpox vaccine itself. By 1901 in the
UK, more people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox
itself. When during 1880-1908 the City of Leicester in England stopped
vaccination compared to the rest of the UK and elsewhere, its survival
rates soared and smallpox death rates plummetted [see table below].
Leicester’s approach also cost far less.
On any scientific analysis of the
history and data, crediting smallpox vaccine for the decline in smallpox
appears misplaced. Any vaccine which takes 100 years to “work” did
not. You can read more about how ridiculous and unscientific the claim
vaccination vanquished smallpox looks against documented historical
fact, here: Small Pox – Big Lie – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication
and how vaccination became a political tool to placate the emerging pre
Victorian and Victorian middle classes that the literally “great
unwashed” disease-ridden working class slum dwellers would not bring the
disease to them: Smallpox Eradication – One of History’s Biggest Lies & How Vaccination Did Not Eradicate Smallpox
The severity of the disease dimished
with improved living standards and was not vanquished by vaccination,
as the medical “consensus” view tells us.
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
Extracts from “LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination” By J.T. Biggs J.P.
[Download Entire Book as .pdf 43 Mb – Or Read Online]
SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with “unprotected” Leicester – 1860 to 1908.
Name.
|
Period.
|
Small-Pox. Cases
|
Small-Pox. Deaths.
|
Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases
|
Japan
|
1886-1908
|
288,779
|
77,415
|
26.8
|
British Army (United Kingdom)
|
1860-1908
|
1,355
|
96
|
7.1
|
British Army (India)
|
1860-1908
|
2,753
|
307
|
11.1
|
British Army (Colonies)
|
1860-1908
|
934
|
82
|
8.8
|
Royal Navy
|
1860-1908
|
2,909
|
234
|
8.0
|
Grand Totals and case fatality rate per cent, over all
|
296,730
|
78,134
|
26.3
|
|
Leicester (since giving up vaccination)
|
1880-1908
|
1,206
|
61
|
5.1
|
Biggs said “In
this comparison, I have given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and
deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, so that they may
be compared either way with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist language, may I
ask, if the excessive small-pox fatality of Japan, of the British Army,
and of the Royal Navy, are not due to vaccination and revaccination, to
what are they due? It would afford an interesting psychical study were
we able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George
Buchanan would have soared with a corresponding result—but on the
opposite side.“
Small-Pox Epidemics, Cost, and Fatality Rates Compared
Vaccinal Condition
|
Small-Pox Cases
|
Small-Pox Deaths
|
Fatality-rate Per Cent
|
Cost of Epidemic
|
|
London 1900-02
|
Well Vaccinated
|
9,659
|
1,594
|
16.50
|
£492,000
|
Glasgow 1900-02
|
Well Vaccinated
|
3,417
|
377
|
11.03
|
£ 150,000
|
Sheffield 1887-88
|
Well Vaccinated
|
7,066
|
688
|
9.73
|
£32,257
|
Leicester 1892-94
|
Practically Unvaccinated
|
393
|
21
|
5.34
|
£2,888
|
| Leicester 1902-04 | Practically Unvaccinated | 731 | 30 | 4.10 | £1,602 |
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
It is certain beyond doubt that diptheria vaccine played no part in the sudden fall in diphtheria mortality from 1941 to 1946 [see graph] . The records show most children went unvaccinated until after the major fall.
Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/graphs/
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu